Re: RC bugs in Linux

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Robert Millan (zeratul2@wanadoo.es) [040603 10:55]:
> Bear in mind that violating the DFSG is a release-critical bug, whereas
> disabling upstream drivers is not. And AFAIK disabling tainted drivers is a
> trivial task, but splitting the binary-only blobs into non-free isn't.
> Therefore if the latter requires long-term work, the former has to take
> priority. So the question is, does it require long-term work?

Please remember that there is a decision of the release manager on
this issue which changes must be pre-sarge, and how to do them:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/04/msg00060.html


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C