Re: Qt4.5 vs. KDE4.2
Anyone knows if Qt4.5 that's in experimental has those new super-ultra-fast graphics rasterizer that's supposed to work 200x faster than X sw rendering?
I would like to know that because if so, then I probably have to go hunting my performance issues somewhere else, like the intel driver for example...
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I've been using KDE 4.2 with Qt 4.5 the day it was uploaded to experimental,
Dominik Schulz wrote:
> recently I've read a post by a KDE developer who did talk about
> compatiblity issues between KDE4.2 and Qt4.5. I think he did conclude that
> it would be bad idea to use KDE 4.2 (or earlier) together with Qt4.5
> because of some pre-Qt4.5 fixes which are made obsolete by Qt4.5 and can
> cause troubles. Does this mean that Qt4.5 (which is currently in
> experimental) will enter unstable not before KDE4.3 is released (and went
> into unstable)? Or did I get something totally wrong here and the Debian
> KDE/Qt Team has differnt plans?
> I do not need Qt4.5 for any specifiy reason, I'm just very pleased by the
> recent development of KDE4.x and Qt4.x and eager to try out the new
without issues. (Except for one, latest amarok crashes).
But then, YMMV.
If possible, Please CC me when replying. I'm not subscribed to the list.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com