[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: branches/KDE/3.4/kdepim/libkcal



* Reinhold Kainhofer [Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:40:03 +0000]:

> SVN commit 451025 by kainhofe:

> ARRRGGH! Just when we release kde 3.4.2, a nasty bug in connection with gcc 4.0 (NOT with 3.3.x, which I use) creeps up:
> It seems that gcc 4.0 is no longer initializing all members of a struct, while gcc 3.3.x obviously did something like that. So we can't simply take a new icaltime structure, since its member will be initialized with random values in gcc 4.0. So everything that later on checks the members of the struct will work on uninitialized values! Rather, we need to use a null time (all fields initialized to 0) and set all necessary fields later on. 
> This fixes the end date corruption (only of all-day events) that vanRijn and and Will are observing with their gcc 4.0-compiled kdepim.

> If any distribution is using kde 3.4.2 compiled with gcc 4.0, I suppose this fix needs to go in!

  Thanks for this notice, Reinhold! I'm notifying our kdepim maintainer,
  but perhaps you'd wish to mail kde-packager@kde.org too? That way,
  other distributions will be aware too.

> (Backport of commit 451010 from the 3.5 branch)

> CCMAIL: debian-kde@lists.debian.org



>  M  +2 -2      icalformatimpl.cpp  


> --- branches/KDE/3.4/kdepim/libkcal/icalformatimpl.cpp #451024:451025
> @@ -2107,7 +2107,7 @@

>  icaltimetype ICalFormatImpl::writeICalDate(const QDate &date)
>  {
> -  icaltimetype t;
> +  icaltimetype t = icaltime_null_time();

>    t.year = date.year();
>    t.month = date.month();
> @@ -2128,7 +2128,7 @@

>  icaltimetype ICalFormatImpl::writeICalDateTime(const QDateTime &datetime)
>  {
> -  icaltimetype t;
> +  icaltimetype t = icaltime_null_time();

>    t.year = datetime.date().year();
>    t.month = datetime.date().month();



-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
The difference between literature and journalism is that journalism is
unreadable and literature is not read.
                -- Oscar Wilde



Reply to: