Re: RFC - more slightly shonky java packages

[Matthew Vernon <matthewv@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Hi,

Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> writes:

> If you really intend to maintain all of them for the foreseeable future,
> I would start with
> 
> libnot-yet-commons-ssl-java
> libowasp-antisamy-java
> libowasp-esapi-java
> libvt-ldap-java
> 
> and prepare them for experimental not unstable. However libraries should
> be accompanied with documentation, so I would recommend to add -doc
> packages to all of them too.

I've uploaded libowasp-antisamy-java and libowasp-esapi-java to
experimental, including their relevant -doc packages. Unless someone
tells me I shouldn't, I'll create git repos for them under pkg-java at
some point in the vaguely-near future. Likewise, I hope to get
not-yet-commons and vt-ldap done at some point.

Regards,

Matthew 

-- 
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.debian.org