[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Considering RM of jamvm and cacao



Hi

It turns out that we have still have jvmvm and cacao in Debian; the
question is, do we really want them?

For reference; cacao has not been in testing since 2006-12-15 (and thus
not in etch nor lenny). jamvm only provides java1-runtime[1].

On a related note: neither appeared to have any r(B-)D left, so it
should not be difficult to do the removal.


~Niels

[1] On a related note upstream says it "conforms to the JVM
specification version 2 (blue book)".

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: