Re: RFS: checkstyle (new upstream release)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-12-04 01:00, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> [...]
>
> I have a couple of comments about this package:
>
> I don't know if all the people on the Uploaders list are
> active in the team or in the project. If there is nobody
> active I can add myself to that list.
>
All of them except Michael Koch are gone as far as I can tell; we should
probably get them removed. Also Michael Koch is rather busy last I
heard, so if you use or have an interest in checkstyle you may want to
add yourself.
> This package should be splitted in checkstyle and
> checkstyle-doc packages but if someone decides to sponsor
> this package I would prefer to avoid the delay at NEW right
> now and introduce the changes to split the package later
> in a -2 upload. If this is not possible I already have
> prepared the changes to split this package anyway.
>
I do not see a problem with it.
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> Cheers,
>
I cannot build it because libgoogle-collections-java does not appear to
be available (tried unstable and experimental) plus it does not appear
to be in NEW either. Am I missing something here?
Also why have you added a strict dependency on ant? As far as I can tell
it is only used for the ant task, so I would assume this could also be
used without ant installed (e.g. if you use Make or some other build
system).
Finally, could you be convinced to rewrite the description to handle
#554606 as well?
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=dPRi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: