[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian GNU/Linux as email & DNS server



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 04 December 2001 21:18, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really
> for sendmail, it has the ability
> to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have
> seen. You definitively have to go
> with woody or sid, but as long as you run a dedicated server and dont
> have 4000 packages installed it
> tend to be pretty stable.. just dont upgrade it everyday, once a week is
> enough, and try and upgrade a test
> machine first to see that it dont turn into a veggie.. :-)
> It also is easy to set up to use either maildir or mailbox format, and
> you can then pick whatever pop3/imap
> server you want..
>
> Regards
> Roger A

You may also choose to backport sendmail or what-ever you want to use.. This 
is what I do when I want to run something new on a stable dist..

add an untable deb-src line in /etc/apt/sources.list
apt-get update
apt-get source <package>
cd <dir-of-unpacked-source>
do repeat:
  check/edit debian/rules
  check/edit debian/control
  edit debian/Changelog to reflect your changes (for own pice of mind)
  do 'dpkg-buildpackage'
  go for a coffee/coke/smoke/beer/what-ever
:until succees
dpkg -i ../<package>.deb
cross fingers

I dunno what debian policy says about this, never read it.. but it works for 
me.

Best regards
 Michael Boman

- -- 
Michael Boman       Mobile: +65 96942601  750C Chai Chee Road
Security Architect  Phone : +65 243 6800  #04-01
SecureCiRT          Fax   : +65 441 5119  Singapore 469003
http://www.securecirt.com mailto:michael.boman@securecirt.com

GnuPG: FA4E C6CC B73E 320E 3349  C64F 76CE 5F40 98AB 689C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8DNBUds5fQJiraJwRAj8iAKCBNpf4sS4q8Q8ONP9+flCUBJ4u/gCfbZw0
vdSz1kXaoIx3TTx1lzn1jQ8=
=CJdS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: