Re: Apache 1.3.27-0.1.ipv6.r1

[Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>]

On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Martin List-Petersen wrote:

> Citat Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> >
> > > Apache 1.3.27-0.1.ipv6.r1 seems to be broken regarding name based virtual
> > hosts.
> > > It just ignores that s***, at least if you use a "*" for the ip. Quite
> > annoying.
> > >
> >
> > I know for sure that using something like:
> >
> > NameVirtualHost 3ffe:100:e:1::1
> >
> > works (for both ipv4 and ipv6 of course)B
> >
> > i will check the * sometime during next week. Anyone else noticed it?
> >
> > Fabio
> >
>
> Probably it will, but i've used the "*" since 1.3.12, when it was introduced,
> especially because it's a pain in the a*** if you ever change the ip of the
> server to go through all of your configfiles and change the ip a serveral
> hundred places.
>

As I promised I did check the config using * instead of ipv6 and I have no
problems, except a few warning messages that are somehow harmless.

NameVirtualHost *

<VirtualHost *>
etc.etc.
</VirtualHost>

and so on .. i have somehow 15 vhosts mixed ipv4/ipv6 and i tested 4 of
them.

At startup i get the following warnings:

[Mon Jan 27 18:40:28 2003] [warn] VirtualHost *:0 overlaps with
VirtualHost *:0, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a
NameVirtualHost directive
[Mon Jan 27 18:40:28 2003] [warn] VirtualHost *:0 overlaps with
VirtualHost *:0, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a
NameVirtualHost directive
[Mon Jan 27 18:40:28 2003] [warn] VirtualHost *:0 overlaps with
VirtualHost *:0, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a
NameVirtualHost directive
[Mon Jan 27 18:40:28 2003] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:0 has no VirtualHosts

even if NameVirtualHost is specified.
You can also check yourself using apachectl configtest

Regards
Fabio