[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 routing problems



Craig Small was said to been seen saying:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 08:07:42PM -0700, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> >   .___________.            .___________.            .__________.
> >   | Host 1    |            | Gateway 1 |            | HE.net   |
> >   | v4: x.173 |--- eth0 ---| v4: x.170 |--- tun0 ---| v4: y.26 |
> >   | v6: p:EUI |            | v6: p:EUI |            | v6: stat |
> >   `-----------'            `-----------'            `----------'
> > 
> > 	In this map x is my IPv4 /28 network and p is my IPv6 Global
> > prefix from HE.net /64... This is how they talk over the ethernet LAN
> > and has no problem communicating... All IPv6 addresses are EUI-64...
> > 
> > 	In the tunnel configuration the IPv6 addresses are static...
> > My side is ::1671 and theirs is ::1670 under the  same prefix using
> > a /127 subneting.. Gateway 1 and HE.net have no problems talking...
> 
> Can something, anything, ping your IPv6 address of the eth0 port on
> gateway1?  It might be that he.net does not have a route to your /28
> network.  When you ping from your gateway, you are using the ::1671
> address.
> 
> Also does your other machine have a route out to the rest of the
> network?
> I find tcpdump VERY handy in this situation.
> 

	Actually I went to DHIS.org's web site and used their web based
IPv6 ping and traceroute utils... I could traceroute and ping to both
tun0 and eth0 on Gateway 1 without any problem... However I could not
ping or traceroute to Host 1...

	Side note is I think I got it working but don't think I should
have had to do what I did... After placing a static route on Gateway 1
for 2000::/3 as well as the ::/0 default route both going through the
:1670 dest over tun0 I could then traceroute from DHIS.org to Host 1
and Host 1 could go connect to a v6 site...

	Still can't traceroute out from either Gateway 1 or Host 1 and
pings from Host 1 out to the 6Bone fail with destination unreachable
notices being sent back from Gateway 1... But it appears to be working...
Why it wasn't workin with the default route (::/0) I am not quite sure...

	Respectfully,
	Jeremy T. Bouse
-- 
,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------,
|Jeremy T. Bouse, CCNA - UnderGrid Network Services, LLC -  www.UnderGrid.net |
|        Public PGP/GPG fingerprint and location in headers of message        |
|     If received unsigned (without requesting as such) DO NOT trust it!      |
| Jeremy.Bouse@UnderGrid.net   -   NIC Whois: JB5713   -   jbouse@Debian.org  |
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'

Attachment: pgp5WBwadAJin.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: