As of now, I recommend not working on the translation of the newly introduced debconf templates in the mumble-django package. Of course, the package maintainer may very well disagree with me...then we'll advice if that happens..:-) Quoting Christian Perrier (bubulle@debian.org): > Package: mumble-django > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > The debconf template added to this package can be defined as debconf > "abuse". > > Most of the time, such notes shouldn't be used to interrupt packages > installation. In the case of the note you used, instructions like "you > should run "foobar" to configure the package" belong to the > README.Debian file, not to a debconf note. > > There is an interestign rationale about this in the Developer's > Reference as well as in the debconf-devel(5) manpage (in short : > "Debconf notes are Evil"). > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: wheezy/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > > Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > > > ** CRM114 Whitelisted by: From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> ** --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature