Re: Fonts for distribution (was: Re: Request for assistance about terminus font
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
> On Feb 22, MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > The OFL FAQ claims it follows the DFSG, but DDs disagree. See
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00454.html
> And many others agree.
It seems fairly clear that forbidding API-compatibility is
troublesome. You appear to be the only DD agreeing with the FAQ
in that thread and you didn't post in the original review.
The gentium package maintainer also considers it non-free.
What lurkers support you by email in this case?
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct