Re: outdated leaf packages

To: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: outdated leaf packages
From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:16:38 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20110313171638.GZ8390@const.famille.thibault.fr>
Mail-followup-to: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110313130047.GK3390@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
References: <[🔎] 20110312165609.GI3390@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 20110312171737.GM10875@const.famille.thibault.fr> <[🔎] 20110312172350.GJ3390@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 20110313130047.GK3390@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>

Michael Banck, le Sun 13 Mar 2011 14:00:47 +0100, a écrit :
> The new list is:

That looks ok.

Samuel

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: outdated leaf packages
  - From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>

References:
- outdated leaf packages
  - From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
- Re: outdated leaf packages
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: outdated leaf packages
  - From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
- Re: outdated leaf packages
  - From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: outdated leaf packages
Next by Date: Re: YotH 2010 -- a Year of the Hurd 2010
Previous by thread: Re: outdated leaf packages
Next by thread: Re: outdated leaf packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread