Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> Is this MAKEDEV script completely new, or based on the one we use for
> Linux?
Completely new.
> If it's the former, then it might turn out that it's fast enough that
> we can just run it, rather than doing the tarball nonsense. You might
> like to time it, and see.
Yeah, that's a good suggestion.
> Have you thought about writing a translator for /dev itself, rather than
> using a script to populate a directory? devfs the Hurd way.
Certainly we have. I think this is ultimately the Right Thing, in
fact.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: