On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 03:16:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sun, 19 May 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > Try GNU/Hurd. > > > This is Debian. > > > Debian is going to be released. > > > Release time is an "emergency", where people in Debian > > > are required to be concentrated on releasing something useful. > [...] > > If you are claiming that GNU/Hurd isn't Debian, then start a proposal > > to remove the hurd-i386 port. If the majority of the Debian Developers > > want to see the Hurd port go away, I don't think most Debian GNU/Hurd > > people will continue if that is the result, because it's wasting time > > anyhow (well, it already was for 3 years). > > I'm starting to have the feeling that you're missing some important part > of your brain, but just in case: You miss my point. > Nobody's saying The Hurd can't ditch the Debian Way. However, if The Hurd > wants to stay part of Debian, it can not do so. > > Note the difference between 'GNU/Hurd' and 'Debian GNU/Hurd'. I see totally no reason why those have to be incompatible. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org IRC ID: jeroen@openprojects GNU supporter - http://www.gnu.org
Attachment:
pgpqlPiMqBwg3.pgp
Description: PGP signature