Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
- To: Richard Kreuter <kreuter@ausar.rutgers.edu>
- Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
- From: Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 18:06:06 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20020512160606.GB559@khazad.dyndns.org>
- In-reply-to: <20020512163337.A16709@ausar.rutgers.edu>
- References: <20020325230855.GA28647@ausar.rutgers.edu> <20020326035245.GA29738@ausar.rutgers.edu> <20020505160541.GB1919@celeron.dekkers> <20020511164524.A12535@ausar.rutgers.edu> <87sn4xeoah.fsf@lgh163a.kemisten.nu> <20020512130908.B15631@ausar.rutgers.edu> <20020512173701.GB727@212.23.136.22> <20020512144055.A16435@ausar.rutgers.edu> <20020512190150.GA655@212.23.136.22> <20020512163337.A16709@ausar.rutgers.edu>
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 04:33:37PM -0400, Richard Kreuter wrote:
> Here's a redraft based on the discussion over the last day or
> so.
>
> The GNU system has been designed with a goal of providing users with
> more power than they have traditionally been afforded on Unix and
> Unix-compatible systems. As a result, several system binaries are
> useful to normal users and should be found in /bin:
>
> mkfs.*
> mk*fs
> *fsck
> fsck.*
> parted
> *fdisk
Are utilities unrelated with filesystems or partitions allowed to use
these names? maybe we should refer to them by their functionality to
avoid confusion.
--
Robert Millan
"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"
Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: