Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:30:41AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote:
> After some poking around I understand that netbase is NOT used for
> the Hurd. Instead there's inetutils. It doesn't feel like Debian
> without netbase and it's trappings. Seems like some good wrapper
> scripts are appropriate. OK, fine, I'm getting over it. However
> there's no route command! The ifconfig command also isn't very
> verbose even using --verbose. It seems like pfinet should handle
> default gateways, but it's not.
While I can't answer about whether or not we'll support the usual
trappings of netbase (I hope we will, for consistancy across all of
Debian), now that Woody's decoupled from unstable, I will be upload an
inetutils that is binary-any.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
One of the great things about books is sometimes
there are some fantastic pictures.
-- George W. Bush
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: