gcc-3.0 question...
Oh Great Guru Kettenis, =)
2 GCCish questions have to come up:
1) configure appears to take --enable-threads=mach, but I can't find a
matching gthr-mach.h file for it. Is this a safe option, or should I
ask the Debian maintainer to not enable threads for the Hurd?
I don't think it's worth writing a file for cthreads for now.
2) I am getting a failure while compiling GCC:
./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/i386-gnu/bin/ -isystem /usr/i386-gnu/include -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -isystem ./include -fPIC -g1 -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -I. -I. -I../../src/gcc -I../../src/gcc/. -I../../src/gcc/config -I../../src/gcc/../include -fexceptions -c ../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c -o libgcc/./unwind-dw2.o
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c: In function `execute_stack_op':
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:300: warning: `result' might be used uninitialized in this function
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c: In function `uw_frame_state_for':
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: structure has no member named `esp'
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: structure has no member named `eax'
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: structure has no member named `ebx'
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: structure has no member named `ecx'
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: structure has no member named `edx'
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: structure has no member named `esi'
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: structure has no member named `edi'
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: structure has no member named `ebp'
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: structure has no member named `eip'
../../src/gcc/unwind-dw2.c:897: warning: `new_cfa_' might be used uninitialized in this function
make[5]: *** [libgcc/./unwind-dw2.o] Error 1
The relevant line is:
MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR (context, fs, success);
This macro is provided by config/i386/linux.h, line 240. This file is
included by tm.h, as requested in config.gcc.
Unfortunetly, I have no idea what the code does. =) Help?
(If I should give more information, please let me know so I can give
better bug reports to you while I'm doing this)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
Reply to: