[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hoogle packaging - a few questions



On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:13:29PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi Iustin,
> 
> Am Montag, den 21.07.2014, 18:06 +0200 schrieb Iustin Pop:
> > 1. Why are we shipping jquery sources as part of the debian patch? Can't
> > we simply +dsfg or similar the source archive if the minified jquery is
> > not good, and depend on libjs-jquery?
> 
> The minified query is good, it was just lacking source. But using
> libjs-jquery would also work, if you want to go through the trouble.

I'll see how complicated it is, then.

> > 2. bugs.debian.org/752941 is a serious bug against hoogle, but I can't
> > reproduce it; is it fine if I just 'notfound 752941
> > my_to_upload_version'?
> 
> Also close it with a mail to 752941-done@; I don’t think notfound is
> enough to make for example britney think the bug is closed

Ah, this I didn't know, thanks for the info.

> > 3. Only lambdabot seems to depend on hoogle; is it fine if I just go
> > ahead and make an upload (won't break any transitions or such)?
> 
> Yes, please do.

Cool.

> > 4. The package ships /etc/apache2/conf.d/hoogle, but that's not a reason
> > to recommend apache2 as opposed to 'apache2 | http-server' (per the
> > lintian recommendation), right?
> 
> Probably. Generally the hoogle package is not in its best shape, so
> whatever you stumble about is likely improved by what you want to do.

Thanks, will try to.

iustin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: