Hi, Am Montag, den 02.08.2010, 10:37 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > Il 02/08/2010 10:28, Joachim Breitner ha scritto: > >> I think that the cleaner and preferable option is the first (use a > >> standalone package), but I'd like to hear your opinion about that. > > > > Letting gitit depend on libghc6-filestore-dev is no option. People don’t > > want to install the haskell toolchain just to use a wiki. > > > > What does the file contain? > > > > Is it likely that an updated filestore will change the format of the > > file? In that case, copying it while gitit is built sounds like the most > > sensible solution. This corresponds to static linking: The code gets > > copied, so the data has to be copied as well. > > > > If we had dynamic linking, this would be different of course. > > The file is a small script intended to be used as a hook in a Git > repository; its purpose is to automatically update the working copy of a > non-bare Git repository when something gets pushed into the currently > checked out branch. > > It's unlikely to be changes in the future, and anyway it's not strictly > tied with a specific version of filestore. Hm, I still think it ought to be copied to gitit. It is just not worth a package of its own. Is it installed automatically by gitit or just for user reference? In the latter case, it could be moved to /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/examples in the git package. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part