Hi, Am Samstag, den 21.11.2009, 08:36 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Em Qua, 2009-11-18 às 14:54 +0100, Joachim Breitner escreveu: > > Or how about introducing a DEB_HADDOCK_PACKAGE variable that defaults to > > libghc6-$(CABAL_PACKAGE)-doc and can be overriden in debian/rules? > > I think this is a good option. Or maybe it's time to create a standard > name for packages, which I propose to be libghc6-$(CABAL_PACKAGE)-DOC. > At first we would make hlibrary.mk build only in this format, and ask > maintainers to do their next upload using this standards. We could also > warn the ftp team about this change, so that they could maybe treat > these packages faster in new. What do you think? I’m still reluctant about changing the package names, but if I’m the only one, I won’t oppose a change. I’m also unsure about what name is better. Eventually, we might indeed get more haskell compilers in Debian, in which case the haskell-blubb-doc name makes more sense. But the similarity to libghc6-blubb-dev is useful as well. Can we have more opinions here? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil