[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Depending on desktop-file-utils for update-desktop-database



        Hi,

Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org> - Sat, Feb 05, 2005:

> >  Hence, my conclusion is in favor of requesting web browsers, file
> >  browsers, etc. which are aware of this MIME system 
> Do you have a list of such applications ? 

 No, I don't have a list, but I can think of GNOME or freedesktop aware
 web browsers and file browsers, and almost no application is depending
 on the desktop-file-utils package, it suggests there's a lot.

>          Perhaps galeon/epiphany should Recommends it (not sure of how
> they handle the mimetypes at the moment, dunno for the other
> application .. do you have any issue in mind ?

 Indeed, these questions arose while reading #286728, and I came to the
 conclusion that Galeon should recommend desktop-file-utils.

 I must add that even if such applications do not need to register MIME
 types, it is a must that they call the update-desktop-database script
 to ensure that it's called at least one before they're run.


 Anyway, I don't intend to fill bugs massively with this issue, I only
 want to bring the topic to the attention of others to see whether
 there's a clear consensus on this.


    Action Plan

 In a first step, I will fill a bug on the desktop-file-utils package to
 request the documentation of:
 - the fact that maintainers are encouraged in depending or recommending
   this package when the program they package is using the new MIME type
   system,
 - the fact that postinst scripts of such packages should also call
   update-desktop-database (if present) even if the package doesn't use
   desktop files.

 In a second step, it would be best to document this, either in an
 official document, or in the Debian GNOME Packaging Policy[1].


Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org> - Sun, Feb 06, 2005:

> >  I suggest we define what should be done to address this problem.
> In fact we should just move the desktop-file-utils Depends to
> libgnomevfs2-common since the current version of d-f-u is not using
> gnomevfs.

 I don't understand your proposal, you suggest to always install
 desktop-file-utils when libgnomevfs2-common is installed?  That's an
 easier path to follow, but isn't it too simplistic?


   Bye,

[1] Debian GNOME Packaging Policy
<http://www.burtonini.com/computing/gnome-policy-20050123.html>
-- 
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
"Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other."



Reply to: