[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

eog and gedit fails when browsing in file chooser



Hi,

After recent upgrade eog and gedit crash when browsing in file chooser

Running eog in terminal it produces
(eog:15175): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 398 (gtk_file_system_volume_get_base_path): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

(eog:15175): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 675 (gtk_file_system_path_is_local): assertion `path != NULL' failed

(eog:15175): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 377 (gtk_file_system_volume_free): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

(eog:15175): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 461 (gtk_file_system_volume_get_display_name): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

(eog:15175): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 488 (gtk_file_system_volume_render_icon): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

(eog:15175): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 398 (gtk_file_system_volume_get_base_path): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

gedit in terminal produces
(gedit:15197): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 398 (gtk_file_system_volume_get_base_path): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

(gedit:15197): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 675 (gtk_file_system_path_is_local): assertion `path != NULL' failed

(gedit:15197): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 377 (gtk_file_system_volume_free): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

(gedit:15197): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 461 (gtk_file_system_volume_get_display_name): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

(gedit:15197): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 488 (gtk_file_system_volume_render_icon): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

(gedit:15197): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkfilesystem.c: line 398 (gtk_file_system_volume_get_base_path): assertion `volume != NULL' failed

Should I file the bug report? Other apps work fine with file chooser (epiphany, gpdf, ggv)

I run up to date Sid.

Mpiktas

Attachment: pgphiEaSKFhvF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: