[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Remove --enable-obsolete-nsl --enable-obsolete-rpc



> Hi,

> I'm still having issues with elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update when
> running with both commits (it's ok when running only first commit).

OK, I noticed core dump (can be reproduced):
systemd-coredump[26018]: Process 26016 (ld-linux-x86-64) of user 1000 dumped core.

           PID: 26016 (ld-linux-x86-64)
           UID: 1000 (foo)
           GID: 100 (users)
        Signal: 6 (ABRT)
     Timestamp: Fri 2020-06-05 18:41:54 CEST (16min ago)
  Command Line: /home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path /home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/math:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/elf:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/dlfcn:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/nss:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/nis:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/rt:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/resolv:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/mathvec:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/support:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/crypt:/home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/nptl /home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/debug/tst-ssp-1
    Executable: /home/foo/build/glibc/remove-rpc.v2.second-commit.2/elf/ld.so
 Control Group: /user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-1.scope
          Unit: session-1.scope
         Slice: user-1000.slice
       Session: 1
     Owner UID: 1000 (foo)
       Boot ID: bfef12e3ca2046009a97d35fb89674bc
    Machine ID: 66e50c6d8dd0edc674b23b51586326ca
      Hostname: dell5510
       Storage: none
       Message: Process 26016 (ld-linux-x86-64) of user 1000 dumped core.
Coredump entry has no core attached (neither internally in the journal nor externally on disk).

Kind regards,
Petr


Reply to: