Re: error: #error Fix asm/byteorder.h to define one endianness
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:34:12PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 07:49:16PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:51:41PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> Apparently on a current mipsel (using sid), there are these errors
> > >> regarding enidanness during building of some packages. Probably
> > >> something changed in linux-libc-dev, though userspace should avoid using
> > >> kernelspace headers when possible AFAICS and should probably use
> > >> <endian.h> instead of <asm/byteorder.h>.
> > >>
> > >> Should I file bugs for the packages that FTBFS because of this?
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think there are actually two problems:
> > > - Programs that include <linux/*.h> which in fine includes
> > > <asm/byteorder.h>. This is definitely a problem of the kernel headers.
> >
> > Is this bug filed? If not, could you take care of that, TIA?
>
> Not yet, I am trying to understand the problem. It seems it only happens
> if <sys/types.h> is included before <asm/byteorder.h>
>
Filed as bug#519761, with a patch.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: