[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#300806: marked as done ((Seemingly) All programs fail to start, with the error message: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference)



Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:36:50 +0900
with message-id <81wtrw734t.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in upload of glibc 2.3.4-2 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 23:11:36 +0000
>From ranang@gmail.com Mon Mar 21 15:11:36 2005
Return-path: <ranang@gmail.com>
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DDW3c-0003yv-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:11:36 -0800
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so1063514rna
        for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:11:35 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=iM2IYjtox7iPoow/s6yRn5U/NLnvuVUwNJUZ+2ZLbXXMJmCTj128hwCqbfuWMcRMDP4nqnvCcMR40pEILlYs3VFK7KXYwGPFuLhjrzeAXYm/x3X0PPx0KDgtrY+xn0Y6ycdeT3xPFlCYIpn69P0G7F2hYPtI3z5/dl1Il/LeLe4=
Received: by 10.38.162.43 with SMTP id k43mr4974644rne;
        Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:11:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.10.1 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:11:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[🔎] db99d18c05032115117f9699ac@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:11:35 +0100
From: Martin Thorsen Ranang <ranang@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Martin Thorsen Ranang <ranang@gmail.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: (Seemingly) All programs fail to start, with the error message: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.4-1

I didn't find this bug in the archive.  

I tried to upgrade some packages using the following command:
apt-get -t experimental upgrade
[...]
The following packages will be upgraded:
  dpkg dpkg-dev dselect ghc6-doc glibc-doc libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i686
  libmcrypt-dev libmcrypt4 libomniorb4 libomnithread3 librpm4 libsablevm1
  libsvn-core-perl libsvn0 locales mcrypt omniorb4 reportbug rpm sablevm
  scrabble sox udev vim vim-common vim-doc vim-gnome
29 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 27 not upgraded.
[...]

With the following result:

Preparing to replace dpkg 1.13.2 (using .../archives/dpkg_1.13.3_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement dpkg ...
Setting up dpkg (1.13.3) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/dpkg/origins/debian ...
(Reading database ... 280069 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-20 (using
.../libc6-dev_2.3.4-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6-dev ...
Preparing to replace locales 2.3.2.ds1-20 (using
.../locales_2.3.4-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement locales ...
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 (using .../libc6_2.3.4-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
Setting up libc6 (2.3.4-1) ...
dpkg: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol
_dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file
ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
cat: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol
_dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file
ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
dpkg: error processing libc6 (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 libc6
sh: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol
_dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file
ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
E: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Post-Invoke 'if [ -x
/usr/bin/debsums ]; then /usr/bin/debsums --generate=nocheck -sp
/var/cache/apt/archives; fi'
E: Sub-process returned an error code
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Now, it seems I cannot start even the most fundamental programs. 
Examples of problem:
$ cat
cat: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol
_dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file
ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference

$ ls            
ls: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0: symbol
__libc_stack_end, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file
ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference

$ reportbug 
/usr/bin/python2.3: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6:
symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file
ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference

I hope you have a solution as to how I can get my system working.  As
I cannot use even the most simple programs, I find it difficult to
investigate the problem much further.
I'm running a kernel version 2.6.10 on a i686, but not even uname
works for the moment, and starting a new login via the console does
not work.  Any help appreciated.

Yours,



Martin

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300806-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 04:36:51 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Thu Mar 24 20:36:51 2005
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DEgZ0-0003og-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:36:51 -0800
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 36C22DEB1E; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:36:50 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:36:50 +0900
Message-ID: <81wtrw734t.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: 300806-done@bugs.debian.org, 300842-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Processed: Fixed in upload of glibc 2.3.4-2 to experimental
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] handler.s.C.11117229887062.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <E1DEfn7-0002N9-00@newraff.debian.org>
	<[🔎] handler.s.C.11117229887062.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 300806-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

At Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:03:06 -0800,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > tag 300806 + fixed-in-experimental
> Bug#300806: (Seemingly) All programs fail to start, with the error message: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
> There were no tags set.
> Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> 
> > tag 300842 + fixed-in-experimental
> Bug#300842: libc6: upgrade fails in i386 chroot on amd64 system
> Tags were: experimental
> Tags added: fixed-in-experimental

2.3.4-1 is existed only in experimental.  I close those bugs.

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: