On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:14:13AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:15:58 -0500, > Zed Pobre wrote: > > Severity: serious > > Please don't use this tag if you modify our original libc6 package. *sigh* If it makes you feel better, I'll run it again without the patch, but I don't expect anything to change. > > I have been attempting to build glibc with the parenthesis added to > > 10_cvs.dpatch as noted in bug#202243 (this is the first, minimally > > invasive patch, not the final patch that actually truncates instead of > > rounding). As it consists of parenthesis being added to four lines, I > > don't think my modifications are the cause of the problem. Running > > apt-get build-dep glibc shows that I'm not missing any stated > > build-dependencies. However, when compiling, I get at one point: > > So your patch breaks something? No, the point of all that was to explain that the patch could not be responsible for the breakage I saw. > Use 2.3.2-4, it contains the latest utimes update. Once it actually hits the mirrors, I plan to. However, I thought you folks might want to know about a situation where libc6 failed to build. > > After this point it actually continues compiling (though I get more > > errors like this about various stamp.o and stamp.oS files as it goes > > along), so although as a novice to glibc I find this unsettling, it's > > not a major issue until it gets down to: > > You should search 'error' parts. I'm sorry, I don't understand you. > > At this point the compilation completely aborts. Taking a closer look > > at the version-info.h file, it contains: [...] > > I forgot why this message were appeared; please use 2.3.2-4. I'll test recompiling with stock 2.3.2-3 today, and then 2.3.2-4 as soon as I can find a copy of it. -- Zed Pobre <zed@debian.org> a.k.a. Zed Pobre <zed@resonant.org> PGP key and fingerprint available on finger; encrypted mail welcomed.
Attachment:
pgpugEqjY_uvm.pgp
Description: PGP signature