At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:59:58 +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > Sorry, libc people, this probably shouldn't have been left as 'grave': > you might like to lower it to 'important' or 'oh no, not again'. =) Or, 'normal'? :) ...And, is this bug really same things as #165699, #165719, #165718, and #165699? Regards, -- gotom