[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for the inclusion of new packages



On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 08:04:15PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
An installer basically is not so different in regards what a user
would do autonomously. For the postinst, for sure there are a couple
of things that would be nice to setup in advance, such as the quantity
of memory dedicated to the jvm and the destination of temporary files
(often the default /tmp is not enough for practical uses). AFAIK
that means adding some .vmoptions files under the binary directory
(e.g. /usr/lib/esa-snap/bin) for snap and gpt.

Even, the snap install needs to be run in unattended mode (-q) with
a custom configuration (and one should also manage the irritating confusion
among ESA Snap and the snap tool, so people should live with the renaming
of snap into esa-snap).


Of course, one of the duty of the postinst would be install the snaptoolbox
by moving files and dirs in the right places to respect FHS and symlinking
around to maintain consistency. It would be very similar to what it is
done for grass basically, which uses a very traditional all-in-one-dir
approach of the good old days of *nix.


--
Francesco P. Lovergine


Reply to: