Re: upgrade orfeotoolbox to 5.0
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
<sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Hi Rashad,
>
> Here's my review of the lintian issues as promised.
>
> Splitting the libraries into separate binary packages with symbols will
> get rid of 39 lintian issues.
>
> Making sure the binary package names match the SONAME will get rid of
> the lintian warning for another three packages:
>
> W: otb-bin-qt: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libOTBQtWidget-5.0-1
> W: otb-bin: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libOTBCommandLine-5.0-1
> libOTBCommandLineParser-5.0-1
> W: libotb: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames
> libOTBApplicationEngine-5.0-1 libOTBCarto-5.0-1 libOTBCommon-5.0-1
> libOTBCurlAdapters-5.0-1 libOTBEdge-5.0-1 libOTBExtendedFilename-5.0-1
> libOTBFuzzy-5.0-1 libOTBGdalAdapters-5.0-1 libOTBIOBSQ-5.0-1
> libOTBIOGDAL-5.0-1 libOTBIOKML-5.0-1 libOTBIOLUM-5.0-1
> libOTBIOMSTAR-5.0-1 libOTBIOMW-5.0-1 libOTBIOONERA-5.0-1
> libOTBIORAD-5.0-1 libOTBIOTileMap-5.0-1 libOTBImageBase-5.0-1
> libOTBImageIO-5.0-1 libOTBImageManipulation-5.0-1 libOTBMathParser-5.0-1
> libOTBMetadata-5.0-1 libOTBOSSIMAdapters-5.0-1
> libOTBOpenThreadsAdapters-5.0-1 libOTBPolarimetry-5.0-1
> libOTBProjection-5.0-1 libOTBRCC8-5.0-1 libOTBStreaming-5.0-1
> libOTBSupervised-5.0-1 libOTBTestKernel-5.0-1 libOTBTransform-5.0-1
> libOTBVectorDataBase-5.0-1 libOTBVectorDataIO-5.0-1 libOTBWavelet-5.0-1
> libotbossimplugins-5.0-1 libotbsiftfast-5.0-1
I don't see how this is useful for the OTB users, and it adds a lot of
complexity to the maintenance of the package.
Why would you split this? If one day external applications start using
OTB it may be worth it, but now I don't see the added value.
Kind Regards,
Johan
Reply to: