On 14-08-15 14:54, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Hi, > > So I've kicked off the gfortran transition. Based on the bug list > in #790757, I've rebuild packages and done NMUs to DELAYED/3-day > > The current status: > > * libgetdata: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * grib-api : uploaded. > * hdf5: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * mpich: uploaded * netcdf: > See the netcdf transition. * openmpi : uploaded * petsc: NMU > uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * qd: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * > slepc: Depends on petsc. #788123. * libxc: NMU uploaded to > DELAYED/3-day * oasis3 : Depends on netcdf * adios: depends on > netcdf * etsf-io: depends on netcdf * elmerfem : RC BUGS. Not in > testing (netcdf, gfortran introduce no new bugs) * plplot: RC Bugs. > Not in testing. * cmor: * Ships .mod file, not used by any package > currently. * Wait until netcdf transition starts, then rebuild. > > > On the related libterralib, libdap transitions: libdap: * libdap > uploaded. * grads: upload tomorrow. * gdal: Depend on metcdf > > libterralib: * libterralib: uploaded * magics++, metview will be > uploaded after netcdf transition starts. > > AIUI, the netcdf transition should be ready. Bas, Nico, can you > confirm? The netcdf packages in experimental are pretty much ready, but there are some outstanding issues [1] and unanswered questions from the previous discussion [2]. It seems with several RMs on vacation noone is available to answer them from the Release Team side. I prefer to wait until the Release Team is available before continuing with these transitions. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=netcdf-split-c-f-cxx;users=debian-gis@lists.debian.org [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/08/msg00252.html > regards Alastair > > On 10/08/2015 07:22, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 08/10/2015 08:10 AM, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> I can, but I am on vacation until Thursday/Friday. >>> >>> The first complication is that this intersects with the >>> upcoming netcdf transition, so we need to agree to rebuild >>> netcdf for gfortran first. > >> I don't mind, if you want to go on with this. Do you expect >> issues > with this? > >> Also you probably need to rename the c++ package as well, see >> https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ > >> attaching a patch here. > >>> >>> regards Alastair >>> >>> >>> On 09/08/2015 22:45, Matthias Klose wrote: >>>> Hi, >>> >>>> would it be possible if you could take care about #790757 ? >>> >>>> thanks, Matthias -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature