Re: [DebianGIS] Re: gdal
[Frank Warmerdam]
> Petter,
>
> Well, I won't dictate policy for the debian packaging, but it is
> my position that applications not wanting to be tightly bound to
> GDAL should use the C API.
I'm making the decisions for gdal in debian, but can only give
recommendations. If the C++ API isn't stable as Frank explains here,
it might be better to separate it out in a separate library package,
and rename the package on every release, or drop the C++ library from
the library API.
For the mapserver package in Debian, I choose to _not_ make a library
package after being explained by the authors that the library API was
still in flux, and they had no immediate plans to keep the API fixed.
See #327853 for this history so far.
Reply to: