[Bug target/17180] [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail on sparc-linux
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-25 07:16 -------
The only change to the front-end:
2004-07-12 Bud Davis <bdavis9659@comcast.net>
* bld.c (ffebld_constant_new_character1, ffebld_constant_new_complex{1,2},
ffebld_constant_new_hollerith, ffebld_constant_new_integer1,
ffebld_constant_new_integer{1,2,3,4}_val, ffebld_constant_new_logical1,
ffebld_constant_new_logical{1,2,3,4}_val, ffebld_constant_new_real{1,2},
ffebld_constant_new_typeless_ov):
Fill and use `rlink' and `llink' pointers in _ffebld_ struct.
* bld.h (struct _ffebld_): remove 'next' pointer, add
`rlink, llink' pointers; remove `negate' entry.
* malloc.c (malloc_kill_area_): Adapt for new `mallocArea' pointer.
(malloc_display_): Adapt.
(malloc_new_inpool_): Set it.
(malloc_resize_inpool_): Ditto.
The changes to sparc target:
2004-07-14 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Backport from mainline:
2004-07-13 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
PR target/13926
* config/sparc/sparc-protos.h (output_ubranch): New prototype.
* config/sparc/sparc.c (output_ubranch): New function.
* config/sparc/sparc.md (jump pattern): Use it.
2004-07-17 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@act-europe.fr>
* libgcc2.c (__enable_execute_stack): New symbol.
....
The only change to the middle-end:
2004-07-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
PR middle-end/15345
PR c/16450
* toplev.c (rest_of_handle_inlining): Set DECL_DEFER_OUTPUT on C
nested functions as well.
* tree-optimize.c (tree_rest_of_compilation): Don't clear decl rtls
for deferred nested inlines.
The rest were changes to someother part of the compiler which should not be able to
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|nearly all g77 tests fail on|[3.4 Regression] nearly all
|sparc-linux |g77 tests fail on sparc-
| |linux
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17180
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Reply to: