[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#233190: marked as done (g++-3.3: Linking to wrong directory?)



Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:58:33 -0500
with message-id <20040217165833.GA31646@nevyn.them.org>
and subject line Bug#233190: g++-3.3: Linking to wrong directory?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2004 10:14:22 +0000
>From davidw@dedasys.com Tue Feb 17 02:14:22 2004
Return-path: <davidw@dedasys.com>
Received: from host173-93.pool80180.interbusiness.it (dedasys.com) [80.180.93.173] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1At2FC-0002vS-00; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 02:14:22 -0800
Received: by dedasys.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 105634C41C; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:12:14 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "David N. Welton" <davidw@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: g++-3.3: Linking to wrong directory?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:12:14 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20040217101214.105634C41C@dedasys.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_16 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_16
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre3
Severity: normal


Hi, I'm getting some funny errors.  It *seems* to be g++, but I'm not
positive:

make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/davidw/workshop/GraphicsMagick/Magick++/lib'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=link g++  -pthread
-L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib  -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib
-L/usr/lib -o libGraphicsMagick++.la -rpath /home/davidw/install/lib
-version-info 1:0:0 Blob.lo BlobRef.lo CoderInfo.lo Color.lo
Drawable.lo Exception.lo Functions.lo Geometry.lo Image.lo ImageRef.lo
Montage.lo Options.lo Pixels.lo STL.lo Thread.lo TypeMetric.lo
../../magick/libGraphicsMagick.la 
g++: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/3.3.2/../../../crti.o: No such
file or directory
g++: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/3.3.2/crtbeginS.o: No such file or
directory
g++: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/3.3.2/crtsavres.o: No such file or
directory
g++: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/3.3.2/crtendS.o: No such file or
directory
g++: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/3.3.2/../../../crtn.o: No such
file or directory
make[2]: *** [libGraphicsMagick++.la] Error 1

This is GraphicsMagick from CVS, using:

@ashland [~/workshop/tcl] $ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 3.3.3 20040125 (prerelease) (Debian)

Thankyou,
Dave

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux ashland 2.4.24 #2 Mon Jan 5 19:10:49 CET 2004 ppc
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on:
ii  gcc-3.3                    1:3.3.3-0pre3 The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.3-base               1:3.3.3-0pre3 The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6                      2.3.2.ds1-11  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++5-3.3-dev         1:3.3.3-0pre3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 233190-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2004 16:58:37 +0000
>From drow@crack.them.org Tue Feb 17 08:58:37 2004
Return-path: <drow@crack.them.org>
Received: from nevyn.them.org [66.93.172.17] (Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1At8YP-0000fA-00; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:58:37 -0800
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian))
	id 1At8YL-0008Ev-A2; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:58:33 -0500
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:58:33 -0500
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: "David N. Welton" <davidw@dedasys.com>, 233190-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#233190: g++-3.3: Linking to wrong directory?
Message-ID: <20040217165833.GA31646@nevyn.them.org>
References: <[🔎] 20040217101214.105634C41C@dedasys.com> <[🔎] 20040217152523.GA28749@nevyn.them.org> <[🔎] 87ptcdvg7m.fsf@dedasys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 87ptcdvg7m.fsf@dedasys.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Delivered-To: 233190-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_16 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_16
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:11:25PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:12:14AM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> 
> > > Hi, I'm getting some funny errors.  It *seems* to be g++, but I'm
> > > not positive:
> 
> > > g++: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/3.3.2/../../../crti.o: No such
> > > file or directory
> 
> > > @ashland [~/workshop/tcl] $ g++ --version
> > > g++ (GCC) 3.3.3 20040125 (prerelease) (Debian)
> 
> > Note the discrepancy.  I suggest double-checking what you're
> > actually running, since g++ 3.3.3 should not search a dir named
> > 3.3.2.
> 
> Aha... nope, it appears that it was indeed on my end...some auto* crud
> got confused.  I was confused because the compile step that was
> displayed was using 3.3.  Must be something icky in libtool, but I
> don't have much desire to look into that.
> 
> Thanks for your time and sorry for the false alarm,

No problem - closing.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer



Reply to: