[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Bug target/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare



PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371



------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com  2003-10-31 21:21 -------
These are my m68k patches from the relevant
time frame:

2003-09-03  Bernardo Innocenti  <bernie@develer.com>

        * config.gcc (m68k-*-linux*): Remove definition of LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF.
        * config/i370/linux.h (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Remove unconditional
        definition and code blocks compiled when not defined.
        * config/i386/linux.h (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Likewise.
        * config/i386/linux64.h (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Likewise.
        * config/sparc/linux.h: (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Likewise.
        * config/sparc/linux64.h: (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Likewise.

2003-09-04  Bernardo Innocenti  <bernie@develer.com>

        * config/m68k/m68k.c (m68k_coff_asm_named_section): Restore
        deleted function.
        * config/m68k/coff.h (M68K_TARGET_COFF): Add flag used to
        enable coff-only code in m68k.c.

I've re-read both patches and they seem rather safe, but...
is it possible that the objects produced during stage3 aren't
really ELF files?

There are no other m68k-related patches in the same period.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.



Reply to: