Re: New gcc-3.1 packages (including gnat)
On 6/04, Matthias Klose wrote:
| Ada:
|
| - should we build gnat from the gcc-3.1 source at all?
Sure.
| - package names: I choose gnat-3.15 and libgnat3.15a. Is this ok, or
| should it be gnat-3.1?
Mmm, at least until we are sure that this version of GNAT is as stable as
the previous one, I would prefer a totally different name (the official
release number will be GNAT 5.0 anyway).
What about gcc-gnat-<date>? Or gcc-gnat-3.1? If everything gets OK, no
problem for moving to your package.
| - Do we want to have a versioned Ada package? If yes, the existing
| Ada compiler has to be repackaged.
|
| - If we have versioned names, then we will need to provide the correct
| gnatbind executable for the build process. Currently I only tested
| with gnat-3.14.
|
| - The installation of gnat goes wrong. I had to explicitely call
| the add-install.common target.
|
| - Sam, please could you update the relink script from gnat-3.14
| for gnat-3.15? Currently all tools are linked statically.
Unfortunately, I am fully booked for next week, then I leave for a 3 weeks
vacation, then two crazy weeks and again one week of vacation. As a
consequence, I will be totally unable to work on GNAT and unresponsive
for the next 7 weeks at least.
| - More architectures: Chris wrote, he wanted to build for alpha.
| Anyone else for other architectures?
Cross compilation needed, not difficult, only tedious.
Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: