Re: Bug#966701: Driverless printing in buster via ipp-usb
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 09:10:39AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 20 mar 21, 14:48:22, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > On Sat 20 Mar 2021 at 14:17:11 +0000, Justin B Rye wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Presumably a cut'n'pasteo. Thanks, revised patch attached.
> > > --
> > > JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
> > > sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
> >
> > > diff --git a/en/whats-new.dbk b/en/whats-new.dbk
> > > index c301cfad..4435fce5 100644
> > > --- a/en/whats-new.dbk
> > > +++ b/en/whats-new.dbk
> > > @@ -99,40 +99,74 @@ see any updates for these packages and they will be marked as
> > > linkend="obsolete"/>.
> > > </para>
> > >
> > > -<section id="sane-driverless-scanning">
> > > - <title>SANE and driverless scanning</title>
> > > +<section id="driverless-operation">
> > > + <title>Driverless scanning and printing</title>
> > > <para>
> > > - Driverless scanning is the ability to scan without requiring a
> > > - free or non-free backend driver specific to that scanner model.
> > > - It is mainly associated with modern multi-function devices, but
> > > - some modern standalone scanners are known to work
> > > - driverless. <quote>Modern</quote> refers to devices that have been
> > > + Both printing with <literal>CUPS</literal> and scanning with
> > > + <literal>SANE</literal> are increasingly likely to be possible
> > > + without the need for any (often non-free) driver specific
>
> For me this would sound better:
>
> ... without the need for any driver (often non-free) specific
Or even
... without needing any driver (often non-free) specific
>
> > > + to the model of the hardware, especially in the case of devices
> > > marketed in the past five years or so.
> > > </para>
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
> --
> http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Reply to: