Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:50:37 +0200 with message-id <20070331155037.GA6323@javifsp.no-ip.org> and subject line Bug#416718: 'rerun lilo' section not applicable for non-i386 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: 'rerun lilo' section not applicable for non-i386
- From: dann frazier <dannf@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:59:01 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070329235901.GA18829@colo>
Package: release-notes The current draft of the etch release-notes for ia64 contains a section about running lilo: http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/ia64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-rerunlilo This obviously doesn't apply on ia64. Starting in etch, elilo (ia64's bootloader) has a debconf question that prompts the user to run elilo in the postinst. So, I do not think we need a similar section on ia64. -- dann frazier
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: dann frazier <dannf@debian.org>, 416718-close@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#416718: 'rerun lilo' section not applicable for non-i386
- From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:50:37 +0200
- Message-id: <20070331155037.GA6323@javifsp.no-ip.org>
- Mail-followup-to: dann frazier <dannf@debian.org>, 416718-close@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070329235901.GA18829@colo>
- References: <[🔎] 20070329235901.GA18829@colo>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:59:01PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > This obviously doesn't apply on ia64. Starting in etch, elilo (ia64's > bootloader) has a debconf question that prompts the user to run elilo > in the postinst. So, I do not think we need a similar section on ia64. This section has been made arch-dependant and no longer appears on i164. Thanks for your report, JavierAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---