Re: Fwd: Rejecting NM applicant Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> was heard to say:
| [ Not very smart cross-posting to debian-private and debian-doc, but I am
| respecting the Cc:. Nothing below is private. ]
[...]
| Just a suggestion to our NM advocates: when you have someone assigned to
| you, try to learn a bit about him/her before judging his/her responses to
| those (fairly procedural) checks. You may be before a celebrity.
For the record, I do not expect any special consideration. It would
probably be a mistake (on several levels) to adjust the process on the
basis of the applicant.
| I hope it is not too late to reconsider Norman's application, both on his
| and our side.
It's clearly too late from a procedural point of view. But there's
nothing that can't be restarted.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As we grow older we grow both more
http://nwalsh.com/ | foolish and wiser at the same time.--La
| Rochefoucauld
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE/CZStOyltUcwYWjsRAnCaAKCeGi8nTQZjExoJ6gF2wrrRRuaxfwCgqs0p
V6+9XJ15JOJAADJA5wquj60=
=b2RU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: