[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xz backdoor



Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net> wrote on 30/03/2024 at 22:59:43+0100:

> Em 30 de março de 2024 13:00:26 GMT-03:00, Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> escreveu:
>>On Mar 30, Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Another big question for me is whether I should really still
>>> package/upload/etc from an unstable machine. It seems that it may be prudent
>>If we do not use unstable for development then who is going to?
>>I think that the real question is whether we should really still use 
>>code-signing keys which are not stored in (some kind of) HSM.
>>
>
> The backdoor was discovered by someone using the compromised xz-utils *in their own machines*. So we are lucky we have people eating our own sid stuff before it becomes part of a stable release.

+1 and <3

-- 
PEB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: