On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 18:31 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I didn't think anyone was claiming they would, so I'm not sure why > you felt like it was necessary to say this. It's the same reason you feel like it was necessary to say this, I guess: On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 09:11 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I just also don't particularly care; I've stopped using ifupdown and > am using *.link units for network configuration How is you stopping using ifupdown relevant to interface renaming? It isn't. Nonetheless I find it interesting to learn how others solve the same problems I face, and appreciated you taking the time to make the comment. But your approach doesn't work for me and I thought others might be interested to know why that is so.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part