Hi, thanks for having this discussion! On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Quoting Ian Jackson (2016-11-14 17:33:55) > > Can I ask you the converse question: what same-timestamp proposal do > > you think is best and why ? > > I found Guillem's suggestion the most sensible and as far as I understand the > matter also the easiest to implement: > > Quoting Guillem Jover (2016-11-09 00:18:25) > > So the actual problem is that the last timestamp gets reused for the > > binNMUs, which seems totally bogus to me. This needs to be fixed in > > whatever is injecting the binNMU entries on the buildds. > > but that proposal did not get any attention… I'm not sure what his actual proposal was. To me it seems a binNMU should change SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, as debian/changelog gets modified by changelog.$arch, so it's actually a different source which is being build. What do you think? -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature