On viernes, 11 de noviembre de 2016 16:05:49 ART Jan Niehusmann wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:15:09PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > At least something like that also came up with xmltooling. > > It's probably caused by this: > > curl_easy_setopt(easy, CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION, &sslCtxFunction_cb); > > > > You get an SSL_CTX from OpenSSL 1.1 and you call an OpenSSL 1.0 > > function with that handle. And libcurl really shouldn't have been > > exposing such functions directly. If something like that is > > really needed libcurl should have made a proper wrapper. > > Yes, I agree that libcurl shouldn't expose such functions. But it does, > and it's to late to change that. > > By exposing that function, SSL_CTX became part of curl's ABI. > > So by linking to a different OpenSSL version with a different > representation of SSL_CTX, curl indeed changed its ABI and must > change SONAME, right? That or switching it's B-D to libssl1.0-dev to avoid the breackage, but yes, you are right. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.