Re: NRSS has been deprecated [#696302]
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: NRSS has been deprecated [#696302]
- From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:58:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20161107195853.GA10153@angband.pl>
- In-reply-to: <20161030185533.GA23602@scru.org>
- References: <20161020161755.owjaxeapirg63ukr@MosEisley.internal> <CAKTje6EEhpAYOTfoG-xMen4fzQYP8dW_fWyOPN6fCt6=tz8+1A@mail.gmail.com> <20161021053437.GA5601@angband.pl> <CAKTje6F_=Y6e2+e-48J-S8gme7Ga7jsZeivN8hmWz4E0zqTk8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20161030052841.GB2162@angband.pl> <20161030185533.GA23602@scru.org>
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:55:33PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:28:41AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > A maintainer would then file "ITR: dasher" and wait for responses before
> > requesting RM.
>
> Why wouldn't you orphan first?
It answers a different question.
Orphaning means "I don't have time to maintain this package anymore but
believe it's worth keeping for now" (as otherwise it'd be a RM).
Intending to remove means "I don't think this package is useful at all, in
its present state nor any state within a reasonable amount of work. Does
anyone disagree?".
We got plenty of packages orphaned for a decade that are in a good
condition.
--
A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol, 1kg
raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month. Filter out and
throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake, etc), let the drink age
at least 3-6 months.
Reply to: