Re: Debian Archive architecture removals
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> You've admitted that the port cannot keep pace because it needs changes
> to be made by maintainers who do not see the port as a particular
> priority and that this blocks or impedes further changes. You've
> tried and failed to increase the level of interest in the port which
> would have changed those priorities and the port has failed to gain more
> manpower. That is a failed port.
Sounds like you're saying hurd-i386 has failed because of lazy
maintainers? I have certainly merged Hurd and kFreeBSD patches that
were submitted and even written patches when they were needed even if
I am not currently running these ports.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: