Quoting Thomas Weber (2014-02-09 13:00:47) > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff >>> <jmm@inutil.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). >>>> (liblcms1-dev -> liblcms2-dev) The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm >>>> going ahead. Below is a dd-list of affected packages. This is a >>>> headsup as recommended by policy, I'll file bugs in a few weeks. >>> >>> Could you note that lcms2 have some ABI problem, and it seems we >>> should do a transition in newer version. See >>> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/lcms.html and #701993. >>> >>> So maybe we should made directly the transition to the new ABI ? >> >> Sorry for the late reply. I wouldn't hold my breath for the >> transition to the new ABI, so moving from lcms1 to lcms2 is probably >> more important for now. > > I have uploaded lcms2 2.5 to delayed/7 yesterday. After consulting > with the maintainer, I have added myself as co-maintainer. Great! That means we can finally get a more recent Ghostscript built, as tracked in bug#701993. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature