On 31.03.2013 23:48, Uoti Urpala wrote: > Philipp Kern wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:33:46PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >>> I cannot influence the R release cycle which happens within our freeze. As >>> have a few previous R releases, and none of those created any trouble. >> >> Thanks for trading the R release cycle with Debian's and for delaying the >> release. The harm has already been done, so somebody should probably go >> and create a transition tracker for it? > > IMO it's important to remember that it's fundamentally the release team > that is at fault for problems here, not the R maintainer. Wrong and no, it's not. > Unstable has > already been frozen for much longer than is in any way reasonable for > either development of Debian, users of Debian unstable, or upstreams > whose current software is either not being packaged at all or is only in > experimental. So help speeding up the release process. It's not like the RT is doing nothing and waiting just for the sake of waiting. There are release-critical problems which need to be fixed first. Hint: You could help there as well which is a much better idea rather than ranting and trolling around. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature