On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:33:57PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hmm, do you have a reference? I've looked in the gnupg git master and > stable-2.0 branches and I don't see any obvious mention of this on the > NEWS file, or commit messages after a quick search. I'd fine it very > strange that such option would disappear, and it would mean that for > example dpkg-dev could not use gnupg 2.x at all then. Upstream has indicated an intention to remove multiple keyring support in GnuPG 2.1. I can't find the reference to the explicit statement where Werner said he was going to do that, but you can see opposition on gnupg-users in the following threads: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2011-August/042699.html http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2011-August/042725.html As you can see from the threads above, I agree that it is a bad idea. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature