|
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2013, Russ Allbery wrote: > Clint Byrum <spamaps@debian.org> writes: > > I do think AGPL complies with all of the clauses of the DFSG. There is > > very little difference in an AGPLv3 licensed library as a GPLv3 licensed > > library. > > I agree from a licensing standpoint. > > I think that, from a security standpoint, an AGPLv3 license on a library > puts any software that links with that library in an extremely awkward and > surprising security situation due to the prohibition on locally patching > security vulnerabilities without disclosure. [...] > Those kind of license terms are very awkward [...]
ouch :(
Thanks for "waking me up", Russ. :-)
cheers, Holger |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.