Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?

To: Praveen A <pravi.a@gmail.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
From: Praveen A <pravi.a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:49:45 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] CAOo+eVpHZC4Maw+3Cy15pVc1CgwWZwdnh1+o54FOzJ0kH5FSGw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20130617111457.GG22521@halon.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] CAOo+eVpHpYwhB5PwUFh9bQ0friUqcTDcdaqo+BQMCyd8whNW3g@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20130617111457.GG22521@halon.org.uk>

2013/6/17 Neil McGovern <neil@halon.org.uk>:
> Hi,
>
> Given that the middle '0' was redundant, and we now do X.0 for all
> major releases, it was simply removed.
>
> (additionally, there were never any 4.0.x releases...)
>
> Neil

Thanks Neil for the clarification!
--
പ്രവീണ്‍ അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്‍
You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your
rights from them; you give them permission to rule, only so long as
they follow the rules: laws and constitution.

Reply to:

References:
- 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
  - From: Praveen A <pravi.a@gmail.com>
- Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
  - From: Neil McGovern <neil@halon.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#712571: ITP: opam -- package manager for OCaml
Next by Date: Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
Previous by thread: Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
Next by thread: Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread