Re: how to deal with "not yet built" / "missing binaries" on autobuilders, requesting transition needed?
Hi,
Thanks for your reply, and thanks Adam D. Barratt and Ansgar Burchardt for
helping out on IRC.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 09:35:46AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
> > 1) Prepare a better ticcutils 0.4-4 package, which builds libticcutils2
> > and unversioned libticcutils-dev (which Conflicts: libticcutils1-dev,
> > libticcutils2-dev and Replaces: libticcutils1-dev, libticcutils2-dev).
> > 2) Submit a bug to release.debian.org, requesting "transition tracking"
> > (as per http://release.debian.org/transitions/), apologising for previous
> > mistake and requesting an ACK for uploading ticcutils 0.4-4.
Using http://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt for inspiration.
> > 3) Once ACK'd, upload and keep an eye on autobuilders
> >
> > Correct?
>
> Indeed.
>
> Please ensure that you test the upgrade path using piuparts though.
Working on that now.
Bye,
Joost
Reply to: